"How to Get Away With Murder" captivated audiences with its thrilling plot twists and unforgettable characters. But which characters truly stand out? This post explores tested methods to determine the show's best characters, examining their impact, development, and overall contribution to the series' success. We'll delve into what makes a character memorable and how these methods can be applied to other shows or even your own creative writing.
Method 1: Measuring Audience Engagement and Impact
One proven method for identifying standout characters is analyzing audience engagement. This isn't just about popularity; it's about the impact a character has. Did they spark intense online discussions? Did their storylines generate significant media coverage? Did their actions drastically shift the narrative?
Examples from HTGAWM:
- Annalise Keating: Undeniably the central character, Annalise's complex personality and morally ambiguous actions drove the entire series. Her impact is evident in the countless fan theories, analyses, and articles dedicated to her.
- Bonnie Winterbottom: Bonnie's arc, marked by trauma, loyalty, and surprising vulnerability, resonated deeply with viewers, leading to passionate debates about her character and actions.
- Wes Gibbins: Although his arc ended tragically, Wes's role in the overarching mystery and his relationship with Annalise continue to be discussed and analyzed by fans.
This method emphasizes the ripple effect a character creates, extending beyond the screen to the audience's real-world engagement.
Method 2: Assessing Character Development and Arc
A truly great character isn't static; they evolve, grow, and change throughout the narrative. Analyzing character arcs helps determine the depth and complexity of each character. Look for:
- Internal Conflicts: Do they struggle with internal demons or moral dilemmas?
- Significant Transformations: Do they undergo major shifts in personality, beliefs, or relationships?
- Consistent Growth (or Decay): Is their development believable and consistent with their established traits?
Examples from HTGAWM:
- Michaela Pratt: Michaela's journey from ambitious law student to powerful attorney demonstrates significant growth, albeit sometimes with morally questionable choices.
- Frank Delfino: Frank’s complex motivations and actions, despite his ruthless nature, show a depth that makes him more than a simple villain. His evolution, or lack thereof, also highlights his tragic fate.
- Asher Millstone: Asher's transformation from somewhat naive student to someone desperately seeking acceptance, often through questionable means, is another example of compelling character development, albeit a tragic one.
Method 3: Analyzing Narrative Contribution and Significance
Consider how each character contributes to the overall narrative. Do they serve a crucial plot point? Do they influence other characters' actions? Do they reveal important themes or ideas?
Examples from HTGAWM:
- Nate Lahey: Nate's investigation and his intertwined relationship with Annalise significantly shaped the central mystery of each season.
- Laurel Castillo: Laurel's role in the Keating 5 and her connection to the larger overarching mysteries of the show proves her importance.
By applying these three methods – audience engagement, character development, and narrative contribution – you can effectively assess the "best" characters in "How to Get Away With Murder" or any other show. These methods also provide a framework for evaluating characters in other media, from novels to video games, helping you understand what makes a character truly memorable and impactful. Remember to always consider the show's context and audience reception when formulating your opinion.
